Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Pure Cycle Corporation and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Analyzing Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) and California Water Service Group Holding (NYSE:CWT)
Pure Cycle Corporation (NASDAQ: PCYO) and California Water Service Group Holding (NYSE:CWT) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitabiliy.
Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Pure Cycle Corporation and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Dividends
California Water Service Group Holding pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Pure Cycle Corporation does not pay a dividend. California Water Service Group Holding pays out 68.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pure Cycle Corporation has raised its dividend for 49 consecutive years.
Valuation & Earnings
This table compares Pure Cycle Corporation and California Water Service Group Holding’s revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | EBITDA | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Pure Cycle Corporation | $719,142.00 | 239.47 | -$1.65 million | N/A | N/A |
| California Water Service Group Holding | $609.68 million | 3.11 | $171.02 million | $1.05 | 37.62 |
California Water Service Group Holding has higher revenue and earnings than Pure Cycle Corporation.
Analyst Ratings
This is a summary of recent recommendations for Pure Cycle Corporation and California Water Service Group Holding, as provided by MarketBeat.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Pure Cycle Corporation | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.00 |
| California Water Service Group Holding | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1.71 |
California Water Service Group Holding has a consensus target price of $32.25, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Given California Water Service Group Holding’s higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe California Water Service Group Holding is more favorable than Pure Cycle Corporation.
Institutional & Insider Ownership
67.0% of Pure Cycle Corporation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.5% of California Water Service Group Holding shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Pure Cycle Corporation shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of California Water Service Group Holding shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Profitability
This table compares Pure Cycle Corporation and California Water Service Group Holding’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Pure Cycle Corporation | -238.22% | -2.45% | -2.37% |
| California Water Service Group Holding | 8.30% | 7.79% | 2.11% |
Volatility & Risk
Pure Cycle Corporation has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, California Water Service Group Holding has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
California Water Service Group Holding beats Pure Cycle Corporation on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Pure Cycle Corporation Company Profile
California Water Service Group Holding Company Profile